A Committee of Correspondence

A Committee of Correspondence

The Predictable Liberals

The Left is predictable in the how they deal with uncomfortable truths:

  1. First, deny it (I did not have … with that women)
  2. Second, attack the other side by giving them dismissive labels ( nazis, birthers)
  3. Last, but not least,the old standby: “Everyone does it.”

This step was taken in the msnbc acticle, “Obama birthplace flap evokes Arthur debate“. 

Here’s their new trial balloon: “Oops, but it’s okay for Obama to be foreign-born because even the Republicans did it.” They go on to cite Chester A.  Arthur may not have been born in the U.S.

Apparently, long long ago, the Democratic party cared about the United States Constitution, at least briefly, and hired a lawyer, Arthur Hinman, to investigate President Chester A. Arthur. Hinman was unable to prove that President Arthur was born in Canada, but he later wrote a book on it anyway. (That sounds like someone the Liberals would hire.)

It should be noted that even if the the Canadian birth is correct,  Arthur’s parents were both U. S. citizens, and his mother was over the age of majority at the time of his birth.  There is no birth certificate, as the state of Vermont did not record births until 1857, over 20 years after Arthur’s birth.  If the Canadian’s kept official birth records, Hinmam didn’t find one for Arthur.

This is the same tactic that was used with Bill Clinton’s indiscretions. So now we need only wait for the equivalent of the semen-stained dress.

Of course, when we finally have proof that Obama is NOT a natural-born citizen of the United States as required by the Constitution from the very beginning of this nation, even before George Washington was elected, it will be declared “insufficient for removal from office” by the unhinged Left.

About The Author


Comments are closed.